If speed produces more innovation & results, why do we have longer work days, more stress & less sleep?
photo credit: Getty images
If speed were the sole driver of innovation and results, logically, increased efficiency should lead to shorter workdays, less stress, and more rest. However, the opposite trend exists.
Misconception of linear productivity
Diminishing returns: Human productivity isn’t a linear equation. Beyond a certain point, working longer hours leads to fatigue, decreased focus, and a higher likelihood of errors. Studies have shown that productivity per hour sharply declines after a 50-hour workweek, and after 55 hours, it can become pointless.
Cognitive limits: Our brains aren’t designed for constant output. They need rest and recovery to consolidate information, process ideas, and function optimally for creative thinking and problem-solving.
Always-on culture and technology
Blurred boundaries: Technology has made it increasingly difficult to disconnect from work. The expectation of constant availability via email and other communication channels extends the workday beyond traditional hours.
Fear of missing out (FOMO) on work: The constant connectivity can create a sense that we need to be continually checking in and responding to stay relevant and productive.
Economic Pressures and Competition
Globalized marketplace: Businesses operate in a highly competitive global environment, creating pressure to constantly innovate and produce at a rapid pace. This pressure often translates to increased demands on employees.
Job insecurity: In uncertain economic times, individuals may feel compelled to work longer hours and take on more to demonstrate their value and secure their positions.
Ways we measure and value work
Emphasis on time spent vs. output: Often, there’s still an emphasis on the number of hours worked rather than the actual results achieved. This can incentivize presenteeism and longer hours, even if they aren’t productive.
Difficulty in measuring innovation: Innovation can be a complex and non-linear process that doesn’t always fit neatly into traditional productivity metrics. The pressure for quick, measurable results might inadvertently stifle more profound, long-term innovation that requires incubation and reflection.
Psychological and cultural factors
Hustle culture: The glorification of relentless work and busyness can create a social pressure to always be working, even at the expense of well-being.
Internalized beliefs: Some individuals tie their self-worth to their productivity and may feel a constant need to be working to feel valuable.
Perfectionism: The desire for flawless results can lead to spending excessive time on tasks, blurring work-life boundaries.
Why this is counterproductive to innovation and results
Burnout and exhaustion: Chronic stress and lack of sleep impair cognitive function, reduce creativity, and lead to burnout, ultimately hindering innovation and productivity.
Reduced creativity: True innovation often requires a relaxed and open mind, allowing for connections between seemingly disparate ideas. Overwork and stress stifle this kind of thinking.
Impaired decision-making: Fatigue and stress negatively impact judgment and decision-making, potentially leading to poor strategic choices and hindering results.
Increased errors: Rushing and fatigue lead to more mistakes, requiring time for rework and reducing overall efficiency.
Decreased engagement and motivation: Employees who are overworked and stressed are less likely to be engaged and motivated, negatively impacting their performance and contribution to innovation.
While the potential for speed to drive innovation exists with the aid of technology and efficient processes, the current reality of longer workdays, increased stress, and less sleep suggests that we haven't effectively harnessed that potential. Instead, we’ve often fallen into a trap of equating more time with more output, neglecting the crucial role of rest, reflection, and well-being in fostering genuine innovation and sustainable results. A more balanced approach that prioritizes efficiency, strategic rest, and employee well-being is likely to be more conducive to long-term innovation and meaningful outcomes.
